SOME ISSUES OF REPEATED THEFT OF LIVESTOCK IN CRIMINAL LEGISLATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2024_31_85
Abstract
The article is devoted to some issues of criminal liability for cases of repeated encroachments under Articles 188-1 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
According to the authors, the situation, taking into account the increased degree of public danger of repeated encroachments on property, is complicated due to the current structure of legal recidivism. Based on the categorical affiliation of the crime, a number of actual recidivism in very common acts remain outside the zone of appropriate special accounting.
The researchers believe that a more thorough legislative accounting and differentiation of the parameters of criminal liability in cases of repeated and systematic attacks under Articles 188-1 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan is necessary. To this end, it is advisable to return to the use of signs of special repetition and special recidivism of crimes, extending them exclusively to theft of other people's property and extortion included in Chapter 6 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (without special compositions of theft). In addition, as a particularly qualifying circumstance, art. 188-1 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan it is necessary to provide for cases of cattle theft systematically or in the form of fishing.
About the Authors
M. N. YerkebekKazakhstan
Yerkebek Muhamedzhan Nurlybekuly – Doctoral student of the Karaganda Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan named after B. Beisenov, Master of Law
Karaganda с.
M. E. Balgozhina
Kazakhstan
Balgozhina Maigul Egeubaevna – Associate Professor of the Department of General Legal and Special Disciplines of the Karaganda University of Kazpotrebsoyuz, PhD
Karaganda c.
References
1. Imangaliev, N.K. O sovershenstvovanii ugolovno-pravovyh norm ob otvetstvennosti za krazhu chuzhogo imushhestva / N.K. Imangaliev // Vestnik Instituta zakonodatel'stva i prava Respubliki Kazahstan. – 2017. – №3(48). – S. 77-84.
2. Krotov, S.E. Differenciacija ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti v zavisimosti ot kategorizacii prestuplenij, kvalificirujushhih priznakov i obstojatel'stv, otjagchajushhih nakazanie: avtoref. dis. …kand. jurid. nauk / S.E. Krotov. – M., 2005. – 350 s.
3. Apahaev, N.Zh. Institut recidiva v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve Respubliki Kazahstan / N.Zh. Apahaev, A. Zhanbaviev // Kazahskaja civilizacija. – 2018. – №1. – S. 77-82.
4. Akimzhanov, T.K. O problemah dal'nejshej gumanizacii ugolovnoj politiki Respubliki Kazahstan kak vazhnejshem uslovii postroenija pravovogo gosudarstva / T.K. Akimzhanov // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'noe pravo. – 2017. – №2(25). – S. 130-136.
5. Czabanski, J. Estimates of Cost of Crime: History, Methodologies, and Implications / J. Czabanski. – Heidelberg, 2008. – 148 p.
6. Balgozhina, M.E. Social Adaptation of Persons released from Places of Deprivation of Freedom as Prevention of Recidivism / M.E. Balgozhina // JARLE-ASERS Publishing – Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics (ISSN2068696X-Romania-Scopus). Summer. – 2015. – №2(12). – Pp. 277-284.
7. Prohorova, M.L. Promysel kak vid mnozhestvennosti prestuplenij: komparativistskie i teoreticheskie podhody / M.L. Prohorova, M.G. Gorenko // Obshhestvo: politika, jekonomika, pravo. – 2017. – №5. – S. 63-66.
8. Demmert, H.G. Crime and Crime Control: What Are the Social Costs? / H.G. Demmert. – Center for Econometric Studies of the Justice System. – Stanford: Stanford University, 1979. – 89 p.
Review
For citations:
Yerkebek M.N., Balgozhina M.E. SOME ISSUES OF REPEATED THEFT OF LIVESTOCK IN CRIMINAL LEGISLATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN. Bulletin of the Law Enforcement Academy. 2024;(1 (31)):85-92. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2024_31_85
JATS XML

