LAWYER FUNCTIONS IN THE ADVERSARIAL PROCESS PERSPECTIVE AT THE PRESENT STAGE OF STATE DEVELOPMENT
https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2024_31_157
Abstract
Within the study the authors consider it suitable to focus on the implementation of the defense function by a professional lawyer, since it is this participant in criminal procedural relations who bears the main burden in the adversarial process.
In the implementation of the constitutional rights of citizens to protection, a number of regulatory decisions of the Supreme court, amendments and additions to the criminal procedure legislation, a number of by-laws were adopted in this matter, including the Law on advocacy itself, which also covered the concept of legal assistance. Based on these legal sources, taking into account the latest changes in criminal procedure legislation (introduction of articles 210-1 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan and others) an analysis of the scope of procedural rights granted to a defense lawyer and a representative lawyer was carried out to make sure that the latter's rights are significantly limited compared to the rights of a lawyer providing such assistance to a suspect and an accused, that is, there is an asymmetry in the procedural position of the defender and representative, as well as the witness's lawyer. As a result, the authors made proposals to amend articles 68, 69 and 70 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
About the Authors
N. T. SakhanovaKazakhstan
Sakhanova Nelly Talapovna – Head of the Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics of the Aktobe Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan named after M. Bukenbayev
Aktobe c.
G. Zh. Suleimanova
Russian Federation
Suleimanova Galiya Zhanabekovna – Lecturer at the Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics of the Aktobe Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan named after M. Bukenbayev, Candidate of Law
Aktobe c.
References
1. Del'manov, S.S. Voprosy otdel'nyh garantij neprikosnovennosti i nezavisimosti advokatov / S.S. Del'manov // Mir Zakona. – 2023. – №5-6. – S. 36-45.
2. K. Sultanov. Zashhita svidetelej: 11.10.2022 [Jelektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: https://zanmedia.kz/zashhita-svidetelej/88744/# (data obrashhenija: 09.01.2024).
3. Madhuri Sarwade. The Law Governing Bail in India and Need of Changing Dimension un-der Criminal Procedure Code: A Critical Study [Electronic resource] / Madhuri Sarwade // Eur. Chem. Bull. – 2023. – №13. – Pp. 515-548. – Access mode: https://www.eurchembull.com/uploads/paper/f299ea6a0abc38b48fc7a3c28f73cfdb.pdf (Access date: 09.01.2024).
4. Shherba, S.P. Ohrana prav poterpevshih i svidetelej po ugolovnym delam / S.P. Shherba, O.A. Zajcev. – M.: «Spark», 1996. – 123 s.
5. Kornukov, V.M. Teoreticheskie i pravovye osnovy polozhenija lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: dis. ... d-ra jurid. nauk / V.M. Kornukov. – Saratov, 1987. – 315 s.
6. Sahanova, N.T. Princip sostjazatel'nosti i ravnopravija storon na stadii predvari-tel'nogo rassledovanija: dis. … kand. jurid. nauk / N.T. Sahanova. – Karaganda, 2009. – 155 s.
7. Ugolovnyj process Rossii; pod red. Z.F. Kovrigi, N.P. Kuznecova. – Voronezh, 2003. – 445 s.
8. Ahpanov, A.N. O sluchajah objazatel'nogo uchastija po ugolovnym delam advokata svidetelja, imejushhego pravo na zashhitu / A.N. Ahpanov, A.L. Han // Vestnik Instituta zakonoda-tel'stva Respubliki Kazahstan. – 2017. – №2(47). – S. 110-115.
Review
For citations:
Sakhanova N.T., Suleimanova G.Zh. LAWYER FUNCTIONS IN THE ADVERSARIAL PROCESS PERSPECTIVE AT THE PRESENT STAGE OF STATE DEVELOPMENT. Bulletin of the Law Enforcement Academy. 2024;(1 (31)):157-166. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2024_31_157
JATS XML

