SOME ISSUES OF DETERMINING THE JURISDICTION IN CRIMINAL CASES AT THE PRESENT STAGE

In this article, the author examines some issues of determining the jurisdiction in criminal cases, reveals problematic issues arising in the criminal process. Based on the research of scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists on the issue of determining the jurisdiction in criminal cases, the provisions are put forward that the signs of attribution of specific criminal cases should be determined on the basis of a set of scientifically based criteria for determining the jurisdiction, and not by one of them. In addition, the author analyzes statistical data and describes the status of the transfer of criminal cases under investigation. Along with this, the powers of the prosecutor in determining the jurisdiction, including alternative, are characterized. The norms of the CPC regulating the issues of the prosecutor's exclusive jurisdiction have been studied. In conclusion, the optimal rules for determining the jurisdiction are formulated and ways to solve this issue are proposed.

1. Salet, R. Framing in criminal investigation: How police officers (re)construct a crime [Electronic resource] / R. Salet // The Police Journal. – 2017. – №90(2). – Рр. 128-142. – Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X16672470 (Access data: 09.06.2023).

2. Vanina, E. Princely Crime and Colonial Punishment: A Murder Case in Historical Investigation [Electronic resource] / E. Vanina // Indian Historical Review. – 2020. – №47(1). – Рр. 7-20. – Access mode:https://doi.org/10.1177/0376983620922414 (Access data: 09.06.2023).

3. Regoeczi, W.C. Homicide Investigations in Context: Exploring Explanations for the Divergent Impacts of Victim Race, Gender, Elderly Victims, and Firearms on Homicide Clearances [Electronic resource] / W.C. Regoeczi, J. Jarvis, A. Mancik // Homicide Studies. – 2020. – №24(1). – Рр. 25-44. – Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767918802885 (Access data: 09.06.2023).

4. Carrapiço, H. Europol and its Influence on EU Policy-making on Organized Crime: Analyzing Governance Dynamics and Opportunities, Perspectives on European Politics and Society [Electronic resource] / H. Carrapiço, F. Trainer. – 2013. – №14(3). – Рр. 357-371. – Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2013.817804 (Access data: 09.06.2023).

5. Kogamov, M.Ch. Predvaritel'noe rassledovanie ugolovnyh del v Respublike Kazahstan: sostojanie, organizacija, perspektivy: monografija; 2-e izd. / M.Ch. Kogamov. – Almaty: Zhetі Zharғy, 2004. – 128 s.

6. Suprun, S.V. Predmetnaja podsledstvennost' organov doznanija po proizvodstvu doznanija / S.V. Suprun // Rossijskij sledovatel'. – 2009. – №24. – S. 4-6.

7. Grigor'ev, V.N. Podsledstvennost' v ugolovnom processe (ponjatie, osnovanija i porjadok opredelenija, problemy razgranichenija): ucheb. posobie / V.N. Grigor'ev, A.V. Seljutin. – M., 2002. – 115 s.

8. Bezlepkin, B.T. Nastol'naja kniga sledovatelja i doznavatelja; 4-e izd. / B.T. Bezlepkin. – M., 2022. – 256 s.

9. Tatarov, L.A. O podsledstvennosti kak obshhem uslovii predvaritel'nogo rassledovanija v Rossijskoj Federacii / L.A. Tatarov // Zakon i pravo. – 2019. – №8. – S. 77-79.

10. Petruhin, I.L. Teoreticheskie osnovy reformy ugolovnogo processa v Rossii; chast' II / I.L. Petruhin. – M.: Velbi, 2005. – 192 s.

11. Kornukov, V.M. Rossijskij ugolovnyj process. Voprosy osobennoj chasti: kurs lekcij /V.M. Kornukov. – Saratov, 2010. – 224 s.

12. Dikarev, I.S. Podsledstvennost' v ugolovnom processe: voprosy teorii i zakonodatel'noj reglamentacii / I.S. Dikarev // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. – 2020. – №4. – S. 113-125.

13. Eralina, L.A. Podsledstvennost' ugolovnyh del: istorija i sovremennost' / L.A. Eralina; pod nauch. red. d-ra jurid. nauk, profes. M.Ch. Kogamova. – Astana, 2005. – 188 c.

14. Michel, V. Institutional Design, Prosecutorial Independence, and Accountability: Lessons from the International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG) [Electronic resource] / V. Michel // Laws. – 2021. – №10(3). – Рр. 58. – Access mode: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10030058 (Access data: 09.06.2023).

15. Freer, E. Overcrowding under the disciplinary umbrella: Challenges of investigating and punishing sexual misconduct cases in universities [Electronic resource] / E. Freer, A. Johnson // International Journal of Law in Context. – 2018. – №14(1). – Рр. 1-21. – Access mode: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-law-in-context/article/overcrowding-under-the-disciplinary-umbrella-challenges-of-investigating-and-punishing-sexual-misconduct-cases-in-universities/BAC01F7B81A70B4F556538CA493EAA7D (Access data: 09.06.2023).

16. Imangaliev, N.K. O sovershenstvovanii ugolovno-pravovyh norm ob otvetstvennosti za hishhenie nefti / N.K. Imangaliev, A.T. Zavotpaeva // Vestnik Instituta zakonodatel'stva Ministerstva justicii Respubliki Kazahstan. – 2019. – №1(55). – S. 87-92.

17. Gagliardi, S. Identifying and understanding barriers to investigation of gender-based hate crimes: Perspectives from law enforcement in Ireland and the United Kingdom [Electronic resource] / S. Gagliardi, A. Valverde-Cano, O. Rice // Criminology & Criminal Justice. – 2022. – 0(0). – Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221120885 (Access data: 09.06.2023).

18. Nelson, E.L. The Relationship Between Individual Police Officer Work Habits and the Stated Reasons Prosecutors Reject Their Domestic Violence Investigations [Electronic resource] / E.L. Nelson // SAGE Open. – 2013. – №3(4). – Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013511826 (Access data: 09.06.2023).

19. Zaharov, N.V. Reglamentacija instituta podsledstvennosti ugolovnyh del v rjade zarubezhnyh stran / N.V. Zaharov // Sovremennoe pravo. – 2008. – №7. – S. 108-112.

20. Ahpanov, A.N. Konstitucionnyj status prokuratury Respubliki Kazahstan / A.N. Ahpanov // Pravovye problemy ukreplenija rossijskoj gosudarstvennosti: sb. statej; pod red. O.I. Andreevoj, I.V. Chadnovoj. – Tomskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. Izdatel'stvo: Izdatel'stvo Tomskogo universiteta, 2015. – S. 64-72.