CRIMINALISTIC SUPPORT FOR THE PREVENTION OF TORTURE THROUGH THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES

The article examines the application of modern technologies and artificial intelligence in the forensic support of measures to prevent and combat torture. The study focuses primarily on a set of technical tools that enable the objective recording of the results of crime scene examinations, artificial intelligence algorithms aimed at identifying procedural and methodological risks in the activities of investigators and forensic experts, as well as the legal, organizational, and ethical limits of introducing artificial intelligence into law enforcement and forensic activities.

The study substantiates the possibilities of subsequent processing and analysis by artificial intelligence of digital information obtained during a thorough crime scene examination. For this purpose, the author presents the patent “Modular Kit for Recording the Results of Crime Scene Examination” (utility model patent dated August 4, 2023).

The study employs formal legal, comparative legal, systemic-structural, and logical analysis, as well as the generalization of law enforcement practice, including foreign experience, and SWOT analysis.

The scientific novelty of the study lies in proposing a comprehensive model of forensic support for the prevention of torture, consisting of three interrelated elements: a modular kit for the objective recording of crime scene examination results; an artificial intelligence algorithm for identifying risk indicators of systematic procedural and methodological violations in the activities of investigators and forensic experts; and a legal and organizational control mechanism providing for mandatory human verification of artificial intelligence results, explainability, and personal data protection.

1. Ju. Jerdal', H. Bakirchi. Stat'ja 3 Evropejskoj konvencii o zashhite prav cheloveka: rukovodstvo po prakticheskomu primeneniju [Jelektrondyқ resurs]. – Ajnalys rezhimі: https://www.omct.org/siteresources/legacy/handbook_presentation_web_rus.pdf.

2. Gurochkin, Ju.D. Sudebnaja medicina: kurs lekcij / Ju.D. Gurochkin, V.I. Viter. – Moskva: Pravo i zakon, 2003. – 319 s.

3. Tursunov, A.B. Kriminalisticheskie i sudebno-jekspertnye aspekty detskogo travmatizma vsledstvie bytovyh travm i dorozhno-transportnyh proisshestvij: nauchnyj obzor / A.B. Tursunov i dr. // Sudebnaja medicina. – 2023. – T. 9, № 3. – S. 299-308.

4. Voevodkin, D.V. Problema vyjavlenija lozhnyh zakljuchenij sudebno-medicinskih jekspertiz s ispol'zovaniem tehnologij iskusstvennogo intellekta: nauchnyj obzor na primere opyta Respubliki Kazahstan / D.V. Voevodkin // Sudebnaja medicina. – 2023. – T. 9, № 3. – S. 287-298.

5. Arrigo, J.M. A utilitarian argument against torture interrogation of terrorists / J.M. Arrigo // Sciense and Engineering Ethics. – 2024. – № 10. – Pp. 543-472.

6. E.N. Begaliev. O perspektivnosti ili necelesoobraznosti vvedenija instituta chipirovanija naselenija // Paradigma sovremennoj nauki glazami molodyh: sb. materialov XV Mezhdunar. nauchn.-prakt. konfer., posvjashhennoj pamjati osnovatelej filiala T.Zh. Atzhanova i A.M. Rodnova. – Kostanaj, 2021. – S. 25-31.

7. Waldron, J. Torture and positive Law: Jurisprudence for the white house / J. Waldron // Columbia Law Review. – 2005. – № 105 (6). – Pp. 1681-1750.