FEATURES OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE CAUSED DURING PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

The article is devoted to the consideration of issues of compensation for harm caused during pretrial proceedings. The authors provide a number of justifications pointing to the need for a comprehensive study of the problems associated with compensation for harm caused by pre-trial proceedings in the course of activities to detect and investigate criminal offenses. It is indicated that today there is an urgent need to develop a mechanism for ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of persons who have been harmed as a result of actions (legal and illegal) or inaction of pre-trial proceedings. The reasons due to which the problem under consideration arose were identified.

The article rightly notes that, despite certain achievements in terms of observing guarantees for the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of persons involved in the orbit of criminal proceedings, there are enough unresolved issues in the Republic of Kazakhstan related to improving the efficiency of mechanisms for compensating for harm caused by the actions of pre-trial investigation bodies.

1. Hanov, T.A. Vozmeshhenie vreda, prichinjonnogo v rezul'tate proizvodstva nezakonnyh neglasnyh sledstvennyh dejstvij / T.A. Hanov, A.T. Sadvakasova // Rossijsko-aziatskij pravovoj zhurnal. – 2020. – №3. – S. 37-42. 2.

2. Seitov, B.T. Dejatel'nost' pravoohranitel'nyh i inyh gosudarstvennyh organov o nekotoryh aspektah prevencii pytok / B.T. Seitov // Құқyқ қorғau organdary akademijasynyң Zharshysy. – 2023. – №2(28). – S. 109-116.

3. Bachurin, S.N. Problemnye voprosy vozmeshhenija (kompensacii) vreda zhertvam pytok v dosudebnom proizvodstve i otbyvajushhim ugolovnoe nakazanie v uchrezhdenijah ugolovnoispolnitel'noj sistemy Respubliki Kazahstan / S.N. Bachurin // Ғylym. – 2017. – №2(53). – S. 5-10.

4. Bachurin, S.N. Provedenie neglasnogo sledstvennogo dejstvija, posledstvii priznannoe nezakonnym v sudebnom porjadke – kak samostojatel'noe osnovanie dlja vozmeshhenija vreda, prichinjonnogo nezakonnymi dejstvijami organa, vedushhego ugolovnyj process: strukturnye jelementy i vlijanie na obshhuju strukturu vozmeshhenija vreda / S.N. Bachurin, G. Sejtzhanuly // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2018. – №2. – S. 110-114.

5. Nesterova, E.V. Analiz sudebnoj praktiki ob otvetstvennosti gosudarstvennyh organov i ih dolzhnostnyh lic po deliktnym objazatel'stvam [Jelektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31680800 (data obrashhenija: 08.10.2023).

6. Hanov, T.A. Sovershenstvovanie mehanizmov vozmeshhenija vreda v ugolovnom processe Respubliki Kazahstan // Sovremennaja nauka: prognozy, fakty, tendencii razvitija: Sb. materialov XVI Mezhdunar. nauch.-prak. konf. – Cheboksary, 2023. – S. 548-555.

7. Glybina, A.N. Reabilitacija i vozmeshhenie vreda v porjadke reabilitacii v ugolovnom processe RF; avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk: 12.00.09 / A.N. Glybina. – Tom. gos. un-t. – Tomsk, 2006. – 24 s.

8. Galiakbarova, G.G., Sejdimbek, A.A. Sovershenstvovanie dejstvujushhego zakonodatel'stva Respubliki Kazahstan v sfere opredelenija kruga sub#ektov na pravo vozmeshhenija moral'nogo vreda: Nauchnyj forum: innovacionnaja nauka. sb. st. po materialam III mezhdunar. zaoch. nauch.- prakt. konf. – Moskva, 2017. – S. 56-60.

9. Cherepanova, O.S. Vozmeshhenie i kompensacija vreda, prichinennogo pravomernymi dejstvijami pravoohranitel'nyh organov / O.S. Cherepanova // Altajskij juridicheskij Vestnik. – 2016. – №1(13). – S. 122-126.

10. Azarova, I.A. Porjadok vozmeshhenija vreda, prichinennogo nepravomernymi dejstvijami organov doznanija i predvaritel'nogo sledstvija / I.A. Azarova // Al'manah sovremennoj nauki i obrazovanija. – 2009. – №7-2. – S. 8-10.

11. Rosenn, K.S. Compensating the innocent accused [Electronic resource] / K.S. Rosenn // Ohio state law journal. – 1976. – №4(37). – Pp. 705-724. – Access mode: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/compensating-innocent-accused (Access data: 02.11.2023).

12. Almazova, T.A. Vozmeshhenie ushherba, prichinennogo nezakonnymi dejstvijami organov doznanija, predvaritel'nogo sledstvija, prokuratury i suda; avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk / T.A. Almazova. – M., 2001. – 23 s.

13. Zheksekeeva, D.A. Porjadok vozmeshhenija vreda, prichinjonnogo nezakonnymi dejstvijami organov doznanija, predvaritel'nogo sledstvija, prokuratury i suda // Gosudarstvo, obshhestvo, nauka: gorizonty razvitija: materialy mezhdunar. nauch. molodezh. konf., priurochennoj k simpoziumu im. T.I. Zaslavskoj «Social'nye vyzovy jekonomicheskomu razvitiju». – Sibirskij institut upravlenija – filial RANHiGS, 2014. – S. 91-93.

14. Strickland, P. Damage to property by police forcing entry [Electronic resource] / P. Strickland // Briefing paper. – 2016. – №06627. – Access mode: https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06627/SN06627.pdf (Access data: 02.11.2023).

15. Wimer, A. Innocent Property Owners Deserve Compensation When The Police Cause Destruction // Forbes, 2019 [Electronic resource] – Access mode: https://www.forbes.com/sites/instituteforjustice/2019/12/03/innocent-property-owners-deserve-compensation-when-the-policecause-destruction/?sh=7de55c565030 (Access data: 02.11.2023).

16. Janssen, P. Recognising Victimhood: Lessons from the International Criminal Court and Mass Claim Programmes for the Compensation Procedure Parallel to the Trial of International Crimes in the Netherlands / P. Janssen, R. Kool // Netherlands International Law Review. – 2017. – №64. – Pp. 237-257.

17. Ferrara, S.D. A novel methodology for the objective ascertainment of psychic and existential damage / S.D. Ferrara, et al. // International Journal of Legal Medicine. – 2016. – №130. – Pp. 1387-1399.

18. Cheloukhine, S.I. Institute of Rehabilitation and its role in protecting the rights and legitimate interests of the suspect and accused / Cheloukhine, S.I., et al. // Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. – 2017. – №4. – Pp. 13-20.