THE INTERRELATION OF LEGALITY AND MORALITY IN THE CONTEXT OF REFORMING OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL FORMS OF INVESTIGATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

The article is devoted to the consideration of the relationship between the principle of legality and such a category as "morality" in the light of the reform of criminal procedure legislation in order to implement a three-tier model of criminal procedure. The features of the investigation of criminal cases in three forms, the regulation of which is fixed in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, are considered. The historical aspects of reforming the forms of investigation are highlighted, the analysis of theoretical material is made, the data of legal statistics are analyzed. Applying general scientific, private scientific and special legal research methods, conclusions are formulated and solutions to the identified problems are proposed. Also, the authors turn to a detailed study of the legislative regulation of the conceptual apparatus used in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, directly related to the implementation of the investigation, the forms of which are legislatively fixed in Article 189 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. In conclusion, the authors point out that the comparison of the investigative bodies with the prosecution seems unacceptable today in view of the proclaimed implementation of the three-tier model of criminal proceedings. It is proposed to amend the criminal procedure legislation taking into account the needs of law enforcement practice and the need to fulfill the tasks proclaimed by the President in the address to the people of Kazakhstan dated 1 September, 2022.

1. Bersugurova, L.Sh. Professional'no-jeticheskie osnovy ugolovno-processual'noj dejatel'nosti / L.Sh. Bersugurova // Vestnik KazNU. – 2015. – №1(73). – S. 345-349.

2. Selina, E.V. Nravstvennye nachala ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva / E.V. Selina // Vserossijskij kriminologicheskij zhurnal. – 2017. – №4(11). – S. 794-804.

3. Austin, J. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined; ed. by W.E. Rumble, V. College // Book from the collections of University of Michigan. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995. – 490 p.

4. Vasil'ev, O.L. Mysli A.F. Koni o nravstvennyh nachalah ugolovnogo processa: istoricheskij anahronizm ili orientir dlja reform? / O.L. Vasil'ev // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 11. Pravo. – 2019. – №2. – S. 104-115.

5. Bohlander, M. Principles of German Criminal Law / M. Bohlander. – Published in North America (US and Canada) by Hart Publishing: Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 2009. – 244 p.

6. Biktasov, O.K. Spravedlivost' i zakonnost' v dejatel'nosti organov vnutrennih del: teoreticheskie problemy: dis. … kand. jurid. nauk / O.K. Biktasov. – Sankt-Peterburg, 1994. – 240 s.

7. Gladysheva, O.V. Spravedlivost' i zakonnost' v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossijskoj Federacii: dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk / O.V. Gladysheva. – Krasnodar: Kubanskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, 2009. – 478 s.

8. Vinnickij, I.E. Funkcii spravedlivosti i zakonnosti kak principov prava: dis. … kand. jurid. nauk / I.E. Vinnickij. – Moskva: Moskovskij universitet MVD Rossijskoj Federacii, 2011. – 188 s.

9. Hanov, T.A. Celesoobraznost' kak princip ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva / T.A. Hanov, A.T. Sadvakasova // Aktual'nye problemy sovremennosti. – 2019. – №3(25). – S. 13-18.

10. Duff, A. Fairness in Criminal Proceedings: Concluding Thoughts and Further Questions: Future / A. Duff // Jackson JD & Summers SJ, London-Hart Publishing. – 2018. – №4. – Pp. 301- 314.

11. Dovbnja, V.A. Sootnoshenie zakonnosti i spravedlivosti v ugolovnom processe / V.A. Dovbnja // Colloquium-Journal. – 2019. – №26-11(50). – S. 118-119.

12. Baetov, K.Zh. Voprosy realizacii i sootnoshenija principov konstitucii i ugolovnoprocessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva pri osvobozhdenii lic ot ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti i nakazanija na dosudebnoj stadii ugolovnogo processa / K.Zh. Baetov, K.K. Tusuov // Құқyқ қorғau organdary akademijasynyң Zharshysy. – 2023. – №2(28). – S. 1-9.

13. Sulejmen, D.D. Formy dosudebnogo rassledovanija v Respublike Kazahstan: puti i perspektivy sovershenstvovanija / D.D. Sulejmen, T.K. Avenov // Tendencii razvitija nauki i obrazovanija. – 2021. – №78-3. – S. 140-145.

14. Robert, E. Implementation of judgments of the ECtHR in the area of criminal law and criminal procedure law from a German perspective / E. Robert // Zhurnal SFU. Gumanitarnye nauki. – 2017. – №6. – Pp. 875-888.

15. Darko, M. Criminal Investigation / Criminalistics in Europe: State of the Art and a Look to the Future / M. Darko // Revija Za Kriminalistiko in Kriminologijo. – 2013. – №64(3). – Pp. 233-244.

16. Shestak, V.A. Models of the pre-procedural level of investigation of economic crimes: spanish experience / V.A. Shestak, V.V. Dubrovin, Z.I. Ilyicheva // Russian Journal of Criminology. – 2020. – №1(14). – Pp. 148-155.

17. Abdul'dinov, R.O. Genezis protokol'noj formy dosudebnogo rassledovanija v ugolovnoprocessual'nom zakonodatel'stve Respubliki Kazahstan / R.O. Abdul'dinov, T.A. Hanov // Rossijskoaziatskij pravovoj zhurnal. – 2021. – №2. – S. 32-37.

18. Alimamedov, Je.N. Ponjatie jetapa okonchanija predvaritel'nogo sledstvija s obvinitel'nym zakljucheniem / Je.N. Alimamedov // Rosijskij sledovatel'. – 2010. – №11. – S. 2-4.