ESSENTIAL TERMS OF THE SURROGACY AGREEMENT: COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS
https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2026_41_19
Abstract
The essential terms of surrogacy contracts are investigated. During the study of notarial surrogacy contracts concluded in the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan, it was revealed that, firstly, their content does not correspond to the legal nature and meaning of civil law contracts, secondly, they do not specify or incorrectly define the main subject, thirdly, they do not provide for agreed and approved the parties have requirements that are essential conditions. A review of Kazakhstan's legislation in the field of reproductive medicine, marriage, family and civil law relations has shown that, to this day, a standard surrogacy contract has not been developed and adopted. It has been established that the lack of a unified form of surrogacy agreement and state control over such agreements has negatively affected contractual practice, which, in turn, has formed its own customs and conditions that do not fully correspond to its legal nature and meaning. Taking into account the nature and characteristics of surrogacy, the procedure and conditions for its application, the meaning of legislation and established contractual practice, as well as the experience of foreign countries, the authors propose essential conditions that must be provided for in surrogacy contracts.
About the Authors
E. B. AblaevaKazakhstan
Ablaeva Elvira Bekbolatovna – Associate Professor of the Department of Medical Law at the H. Dosmukhamedov School of Public Health, Candidate of Law Sciences
Almaty
S. B. Sautbayeva
Kazakhstan
Sautbayeva Saltanat Bakytzhanovna – Senior Lecturer of the Department of Jurisprudence Faculty of Economics and Law, Master of Law Sciences
Aktobe
References
1. Kaur, R. Surrogacy in India: Legal, Ethical, and Social Dimensions / R. Kaur, et al. // Journal of Neonatal Surgery. – 2025. – № 14 (12s). – Pp. 684-686.
2. Horsey, K. The future of surrogacy: a review of current global trends and national landscapes / K. Horsey // Reproductive BioMedicine. – 2024. – Vol. 48. Issue 5. – Pp. 1-16.
3. Nұrmaғanbet, E.T. Қazaқstan Respublikasynda қosalқy reproduktivtіk әdіster men tehnologijalar arқyly reproduktivtі құқyқtardy zhүzege asyrudyң құқyқtyқ retteluі / E.T. Nұrmaғanbet, Je.O. Tojlybekova // Құқyқ қorғau organdary akademijasynyң Zharshysy. – 2026. – № 1 (39). – 30-40 b.
4. Cydypova, N.V. Dogovor surrogatnogo materinstva: analiz pravovoj prirody dogovora surrogatnogo materinstva, ego sushhestvennyh uslovij i posledstvij narushenija dogovora / N.V. Cydypova // Voprosy rossijskoj justicii. – 2025. – Vyp. 37. – S. 246-255.
5. Parajdin uulu, Sh. Kyrgyz Respublikasynyn myjzamdary menen karyn jenelik institutun ukuktuk zhөngө saluu / Sh. Parajdin uulu // OSh mamlekettik universitetinin Zharchysy. Ukuk. – 2023. – № 2 (3). – Pp. 6-11.
6. Novic'ka, M.M. Progalini u normativno-pravovomu reguljuvannі surogatnogo materinstva v Ukraїnі ta analіz dosvіdu zarubіzhnih kraїn / M.M. Novic'ka, A.V. Kozhushko // Pravovі gorizonti. – 2020. – № 22 (35). – Pp. 76-81.
Review
For citations:
Ablaeva E.B., Sautbayeva S.B. ESSENTIAL TERMS OF THE SURROGACY AGREEMENT: COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS. Bulletin of the Law Enforcement Academy. 2026;(3 (41)):19-28. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2026_41_19
JATS XML


