Preview

Bulletin of the Law Enforcement Academy

Advanced search

SITUATIONAL-ROLE APPROACH IN PREDICTING THE BEHAVIOR OF PARTICIPANTS IN INVESTIGATIVE ACTIONS

https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2026_41_121

Abstract

The article examines the issue of high information uncertainty and time deficit in investigative activities. Primary attention is focused on the unpredictability of the behavior of participants in investigative actions, which often leads to tactical errors and a decrease in the quality of the investigation. The purpose of the study is the scientific substantiation of the situational-role approach as a conceptual basis for psychological forecasting. The author proves that this approach serves as an effective heuristic tool, allowing the overcoming of information redundancy by integrating disparate personality traits into consolidated constructs – predictively significant roles. In the course of the work, it was concluded that the use of the developed role modeling algorithm significantly increases the accuracy of the forecast (cooperation or opposition) compared to intuitive methods. The main findings emphasize the need to implement scientifically substantiated predictive models into practice to minimize investigative errors and optimize tactical influence on the participants of the investigation.

About the Author

A. T. Bulatova
The Law Enforcement Academy under the Procesutor General’s Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan

Bulatova Ainagul Tolybaevna – Senior lecturer of the Department of Professional Training at the Institute of Professional Training, Master of Law

Kosshy 



References

1. D'jachkova, Ju.E. Psihologicheskij prognoz povedenija uchastnikov sledstvennyh dejstvij pri rassledovanii prestuplenij: dis. … kand. psihol. nauk: 19.00.06 / Ju.E. D'jachkova. – Moskva, 2004. – 277 s.

2. Salfetkin, R.A. Psihologicheskij prognoz povedenija uchastnikov sledstvennyh dejstvij pri rassledovanii prestuplenij: metody i praktika / R.A. Salfetkin // Agrarnoe i zemel'noe pravo. – 2023. – № 7 (223). – S. 134-136.

3. Juridicheskaja psihologija: uchebnik dlja studentov vuzov, obuchajushhihsja po special'nosti «Jurisprudencija» / [I.I. Aminov i dr.]. – M.: JuNITI-DANA, 2012. – 415 s.

4. D'jachkova, Ju.E. Juridicheskaja psihologija. Psihologija predvaritel'nogo rassledovanija prestuplenij: konspekt lekcij / Ju.E. D'jachkova. – Cheljabinsk: Izdatel'skij centr JuUrGU, 2016. – 149 s.

5. Jekman, P. Psihologija lzhi. Obmani menja, esli smozhesh' / P. Jekman; [per. s angl. N. Isupovoj i dr.]. – SanktPeterburg: Piter, 2021. – 384 s.

6. Kelley, H.H. Attribution Theory in Social Psychology / H.H. Kelley // Nebraska Symposium on Motivation / ed. by D. Levine. – Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967. – Vol. 15. – Pp. 192-238.

7. Pennington, N. Explaining the evidence: tests of the story model for juror decision making / N. Pennington, R. Hastie // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. – 1992. – Vol. 62. – Pp. 189-206.

8. Agamirov, K.V. Problemy juridicheskogo prognozirovanija: metodologija, teorija, praktika: monografija / K.V. Agamirov; pod nauch. red. d.ju.n., prof. R.V. Shagievoj. – M.: JuRKOMPANI, 2015. – 408 s.

9. Feigenson, N. Jurors’ emotions and judgments of legal responsibility and blame: What does the experimental research tell us? / N. Feigenson // Emotion Review. – 2015. – № 8 (1). – Pp. 26-31.

10. Neuwirth, K. Peer and social influence on opinion expression: combining the theories of planned behavior and the spiral of silence / K. Neuwirth, E. Frederick // Communication Research. – 2004. – Vol. 31. – Pp. 669-703.

11. Tapp, J.L. Law, justice and the individual in society: psychological and legal issues / J.L. Tapp, F.J. Levine, (eds). – N.Y., 1977. – 471 p.

12. Zamylin, E.I. Kriminalisticheskoe prognozirovanie v processe obespechenija bezopasnosti lic, sodejstvujushhih ugolovnomu sudoproizvodstvu / E.I. Zamylin // Vestnik Volgogradskoj akademii MVD Rossii. – 2009. – № 1 (8). – S. 40-47.

13. Vrij, A. Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked / A. Vrij, P.A. Granhag // Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. – 2012. – № 1 (2). – Pp. 110-117.

14. Han, V.V. Prezumpcija nevinovnosti kak korreljat material'noj istiny / V.V. Han // Құқyқ қorғau organdary akademijasynyң Zharshysy. – 2025. – № 1 (35). – S. 203-207.

15. Kleinberg, B. Measuring cognitive load in investigative interviews: New horizons / B. Kleinberg, G. Verschuere // Applied Cognitive Psychology. – 2021. – Vol. 35. No. 4. – Pp. 995-1007.

16. Hoog, C. Role-playing and behavioral profiling in forensic interviews: A contemporary review / C. Hoog, J. Alm // Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. – 2023. – Vol. 30. No. 2. – Pp. 215-231.


Review

For citations:


Bulatova A.T. SITUATIONAL-ROLE APPROACH IN PREDICTING THE BEHAVIOR OF PARTICIPANTS IN INVESTIGATIVE ACTIONS. Bulletin of the Law Enforcement Academy. 2026;(3 (41)):121-129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2026_41_121

Views: 53

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2518-7252 (Print)
ISSN 3079-4609 (Online)