FEATURES OF APPEALS AGAINST VERDICTS HANDED DOWN BYA COURT WITH THE PARTICIPATION OF JURORS
https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2026_39_140
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of such a criminal procedure institution as a jury trial in Kazakhstan. In this article, the authors focused on considering the theory and practice of appellate proceedings for jury verdicts. Thus, the author's experience of participation in criminal trials with the participation of jurors shows that there are still problems that require a solution.
The analysis of two real cases of criminal proceedings was used by the authors to formulate recommendations to avoid deliberate delay in proceedings by the public prosecution authorities.
The authors make four specific proposals affecting the general wording of article 662 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, specifying the content of subparagraph 5) of paragraph 2 of article 662 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, additions to part three of article 657 of the Code of Administrative Offenses and, in general, establishing the personal responsibility of the presiding judge for violations committed during the trial.
Keywords
About the Authors
B. T. BuleuliyevKazakhstan
Buleuliyev Bakhtiyar Tulegenovich – Professor of the Department of Law, Doctor of Law
Astana
S. A. Arystambayeva
Kazakhstan
Arystambayeva Svetlana Andreevna – Co-founder, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Master of Law
Astana
References
1. Chistilina, D.O. Osobennosti apelljacionnogo porjadka obzhalovanija reshenij sudov s uchastiem prisjazhnyh zasedatelej / D.O. Chistilina // Juridicheskij vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. – 2020. – № 2. – S. 136-141.
2. Gavrilova, A.V. Sud prisjazhnyh: jevoljucija apelljacionnogo obzhalovanija v Rossii i na postsovetskom prostranstve / A.V. Gavrilova // Juridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka. – 2025. – № 7. – S. 36-39.
3. Il'juhov, A.A. Apelljacionnoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam s uchastiem prisjazhnyh zasedatelej: problemy i puti razreshenija pravovyh nesootvetstvij / A.A. Il'juhov // Rassledovanie prestuplenij: problemy i puti ih reshenija. – 2020. – № 2 (28). – S.77-80.
4. Razinkina, A.N. Osobennosti obzhalovanija prigovorov, postanovlennyh sudom s uchastiem prisjazhnyh zasedatelej / A.N. Razinkina // Kriminalist##. – 2018. – № 2 (23). – S. 102-112.
5. Buleuliev,B.T.NovyjugolovnyjprocessKazahstana: k sledstvennymsud'jami sudamprisjazhnyh. Sostojanie i perspektivy: monografija / B.T. Buleuliev. – Astana, 2022. – 420s.
6. J. Fiedler. Revision Teil 1 – Zulässigkeit. – 06.10.2022 [Jelektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: https://www.juraindividuell.de/artikel/strafprozess-revision-zulaessigkeit/ (data obrashhenija: 25.11.2025).
7. D. Klesczewski. Die Berufung im Strafprozessrecht, Beispiel Deutschland [Jelektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: https://www.jura.uni-leipzig.de/fileadmin/Fakult%C3%A4t_Juristen/Professuren/Klesczewski/Dokumente/Forschung/berufung.pdf. (data obrashhenija: 25.1
Review
For citations:
Buleuliyev B.T., Arystambayeva S.A. FEATURES OF APPEALS AGAINST VERDICTS HANDED DOWN BYA COURT WITH THE PARTICIPATION OF JURORS. Bulletin of the Law Enforcement Academy. 2026;(1 (39)):140-147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2026_39_140
JATS XML

