Preview

Bulletin of the Law Enforcement Academy

Advanced search

FEATURES OF APPEALS AGAINST VERDICTS HANDED DOWN BYA COURT WITH THE PARTICIPATION OF JURORS

https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2026_39_140

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of such a criminal procedure institution as a jury trial in Kazakhstan. In this article, the authors focused on considering the theory and practice of appellate proceedings for jury verdicts. Thus, the author's experience of participation in criminal trials with the participation of jurors shows that there are still problems that require a solution.

The analysis of two real cases of criminal proceedings was used by the authors to formulate recommendations to avoid deliberate delay in proceedings by the public prosecution authorities.

The authors make four specific proposals affecting the general wording of article 662 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, specifying the content of subparagraph 5) of paragraph 2 of article 662 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, additions to part three of article 657 of the Code of Administrative Offenses and, in general, establishing the personal responsibility of the presiding judge for violations committed during the trial.

About the Authors

B. T. Buleuliyev
Esil University
Kazakhstan

Buleuliyev Bakhtiyar Tulegenovich – Professor of the Department of Law, Doctor of Law

Astana



S. A. Arystambayeva
The International Academy of Informatization
Kazakhstan

Arystambayeva Svetlana Andreevna – Co-founder, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Master of Law

Astana



References

1. Chistilina, D.O. Osobennosti apelljacionnogo porjadka obzhalovanija reshenij sudov s uchastiem prisjazhnyh zasedatelej / D.O. Chistilina // Juridicheskij vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. – 2020. – № 2. – S. 136-141.

2. Gavrilova, A.V. Sud prisjazhnyh: jevoljucija apelljacionnogo obzhalovanija v Rossii i na postsovetskom prostranstve / A.V. Gavrilova // Juridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka. – 2025. – № 7. – S. 36-39.

3. Il'juhov, A.A. Apelljacionnoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam s uchastiem prisjazhnyh zasedatelej: problemy i puti razreshenija pravovyh nesootvetstvij / A.A. Il'juhov // Rassledovanie prestuplenij: problemy i puti ih reshenija. – 2020. – № 2 (28). – S.77-80.

4. Razinkina, A.N. Osobennosti obzhalovanija prigovorov, postanovlennyh sudom s uchastiem prisjazhnyh zasedatelej / A.N. Razinkina // Kriminalist##. – 2018. – № 2 (23). – S. 102-112.

5. Buleuliev,B.T.NovyjugolovnyjprocessKazahstana: k sledstvennymsud'jami sudamprisjazhnyh. Sostojanie i perspektivy: monografija / B.T. Buleuliev. – Astana, 2022. – 420s.

6. J. Fiedler. Revision Teil 1 – Zulässigkeit. – 06.10.2022 [Jelektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: https://www.juraindividuell.de/artikel/strafprozess-revision-zulaessigkeit/ (data obrashhenija: 25.11.2025).

7. D. Klesczewski. Die Berufung im Strafprozessrecht, Beispiel Deutschland [Jelektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: https://www.jura.uni-leipzig.de/fileadmin/Fakult%C3%A4t_Juristen/Professuren/Klesczewski/Dokumente/Forschung/berufung.pdf. (data obrashhenija: 25.1


Review

For citations:


Buleuliyev B.T., Arystambayeva S.A. FEATURES OF APPEALS AGAINST VERDICTS HANDED DOWN BYA COURT WITH THE PARTICIPATION OF JURORS. Bulletin of the Law Enforcement Academy. 2026;(1 (39)):140-147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2026_39_140

Views: 114

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2518-7252 (Print)
ISSN 3079-4609 (Online)