ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT IN THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE: PRACTICE OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC AND FOREIGN EXPERIENCE (COMPARATIVE ASPECT)
Abstract
The article examines the introduction of electronic document management in the prosecutor's offices of the Kyrgyz Republic and provides a comparative analysis of foreign experience (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Republic of Korea, Russia, China). The main achievements and problems of digitalization of prosecutorial bodies are noted. Particular attention is paid to how Kyrgyzstan uses the experience of Kazakhstan in this field. It has been revealed that the implementation of automated records management systems and a unified electronic register significantly increase the efficiency of supervisory activities, reduces the time for consideration of materials, and increases the transparency of prosecutorial supervision. Foreign experience (including the use of the informationanalytical system “Qadaǵalau” in Kazakhstan, total digitalization of records management in the Republic of Korea, and experiments with AI-prosecutors in China) demonstrates the prospects for further digital transformation of the prosecutor's office.
About the Authors
I. S. MaatovKyrgyzstan
Maatov Islam Suerkulovich – Deputy Prosecutor of the Aravan region of the Osh district of the Kyrgyz Republic
Bishkek
A. K. Kiyazov
Kyrgyzstan
Kiyazov Almaz Kemelbekovich – Head of the Personnel and Professional Development Department of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Kyrgyz Republic
Bishkek
References
1. Gruzdev, V.V. Cifrovizacija kak sredstvo povyshenija jeffektivnosti nadzornoj dejatel'nosti prirodoohrannyh prokuratur, sozdannyh po bassejnovomu (jekosistemnomu) principu / V.V. Gruzdev i dr. // Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2022. – T. 28. № 2. – S. 253-266.
2. R. Harizov. Registrirovat' prestuplenija v Kyrgyzstane budut v novyh informacionnyh sistemah [Electronic resource] // 24.kg. – 01.12.2021. – Access mode: https://24.kg/obschestvo/215667_registrirovat_prestupleniya_vnbspkyirgyizstane_budut_vnbspnovyih_informatsionnyih_sistemah/ (Access date: 07.09.2025).
3. Asanbekov, T.Zh. Problemy i perspektivy realizacii antikorrupcionnoj politiki v Kyrgyzskoj Respublike / T.Zh. Asanbekov, S.N. Mamatov, D.Zh. Asanbekova // Vestnik Oshskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2024. – № 4. – S. 178-192.
4. Ismagulova, A.T. Razvitie ugolovnogo prava Respubliki Kazahstan v kontekste primenenija sovremennyh cifrovyh tehnologij: problemy i perspektivy / A.T. Ismagulova. – Saratov: Saratovskaja gosudarstvennaja juridicheskaja akademija, 2021. – 252 s.
5. Toshmatova, V. Vnedrenie iskusstvennogo intellekta v pravovuju sistemu Respubliki Uzbekistan: perspektivy i pravovye aspekty / V. Toshmatova, S. Rasulov // Obshhestvennye nauki v sovremennom mire. – 2025. – T. 4. № 7. – S. 20-25.
6. Hudajnazarov, F.H. Kichik Biznes Sub#ektlari Faolijatini Raқamli Tehnologijalar Asosida Rivozhlanti-rishning Me#jorij-Ҳuқuқij Asoslari / F.H. Hudajnazarov // Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, Educational, Natural And Social Sciences Scientific Journal. – 2024. – № 4 (9). – S. 266–276.
7. Sereda, E.V. Cifrovaja transformacija organov prokuratury Rossijskoj Federacii i stran SNG / E.V. Sereda, N.A. Chesnokov // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Obrazovanie i pedagogicheskie nauki. – 2020. – № 2 (835). – S. 269-273.
8. Besschasnyj, S.A. Cifrovaja transformacija organov prokuratury Rossijskoj Federacii // Prokuratura: istorija i sovremennost' – 300 let prokurature Rossii (Suharevskie chtenija). – 2022. – S. 16-25.
9. Park, J. Digitalization of South Korea's Justice System: Enhancing Access and Efficiency / J. Park, et al. – Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 2025. – 89 p.
10. Wu, W. Access to technology, access to justice: China’s artificial intelligence application in criminal pro-ceedings / W. Wu, X. Lin // International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice. – 2025. – T. 81. – Pp. 100741.
11. Zhiyuan, G. The Application of Artificial Intelligence in China’s Criminal Justice System / G. Zhiyuan, Y. Jiajia // Legal Issues in the digital Age. – 2025. – № 1. – Pp. 83-104.
12. Ulbricht, B.R. Digital Eyewitnesses: Using New Technologies to Authenticate Evidence in Human Rights Litigation / B.R. Ulbricht, et al. // Stanford Law Review. – 2022. – Vol. 74. – Pp. 851-894.
Review
For citations:
Maatov I.S., Kiyazov A.K. ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT IN THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE: PRACTICE OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC AND FOREIGN EXPERIENCE (COMPARATIVE ASPECT). Bulletin of the Law Enforcement Academy. 2025;(3 (37)):183-193.
JATS XML

