Preview

Bulletin of the Law Enforcement Academy

Advanced search

Forced payment as a tool protection of the rights of the victim of a criminal offense in the Republic of Kazakhstan

https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2023_27_73

Abstract

The article highlights the issues of forced payment as another measure of criminal legal impact aimed at restoring the rights of victims of criminal offenses. The author, based on the analysis of the norms of criminal, criminal procedure legislation, including the explanations of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan within the framework of regulatory decisions, legislation on the Compensation Fund for Victims, identified problematic aspects of legislative regulation in terms of categories of victims claiming to receive payments from the Compensation Fund for victims, as well as imperfections of the norms of criminal legislation on compulsory payment in parts of those persons whose guilt has been proven, but there is no conviction in connection with the application of incentive norms. Taking into account the progressive experience of foreign legislation, comparison of the norms of criminal, criminal procedure legislation and the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan «On the Compensation Fund for Victims», the ways of further improvement of the norms on compulsory payment are proposed.

About the Author

O. B. Filipets
The Law Enforcement Academy under the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan

Filipets Oksana Borisovna – Associate Professor of the Department of Special Legal Disciplines of the Institute of Postgraduate Education, Candidate of Legal Sciences

Kosshy c.



References

1. Bryleva, E.A. Celi nakazanija na sovremennom jetape razvitija Rossijskogo gosudarstva: vosstanovlenie social'noj spravedlivosti ili kara? / E.A. Bryleva // Administrator suda. – 2019. – №4. – S. 43-47.

2. Friedman, B. Statutory Inejauality: The Logics of Monetary Sanctions in State Lashh [Electronic resource] / B. Friedman, M. Pattillo // National Library of Medicine. – 2019. – №5(1). – rr. 173-196. –Access mode: https://shhshhshh.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059699/ (Access data: 10.11.2022).

3. Federal Criminal Restitution / Most Debt is Outstanding and Oversight of Collections Could be Improved [Electronic resource] – 2018. – 56 r. – Access mode: https://shhshhshh.gao.gov/assets/690/689830.pdf (Access data: 11.11.2022).

4. Abdullaeva, N.A. Sudebnyj shtraf v rossijskom zakonodatel'stve i zakonodatel'stve zarubezhnyh stran. Sravnitel'no-pravovoj analiz / N.A. Abdullaeva // Gosudarstvennaja sluzhba i kadry. – 2021. – №3. – S. 123-124.

5. Klimova, Ja.A. Prekrashhenie ugolovnogo dela v svjazi s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa: problemy pravoprimenenija / Ja.A. Klimova // Vestnik Volgogradskoj akademii MVD Rossii. – 2020. – №1(52). – S. 101-110.


Review

For citations:


Filipets O.B. Forced payment as a tool protection of the rights of the victim of a criminal offense in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of the Law Enforcement Academy. 2023;(1 (27)):73-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2023_27_73

Views: 97

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2518-7252 (Print)
ISSN 3079-4609 (Online)