MODELS OF LEGAL REGULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTIGATION IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES AND PROSPECTS FOR THEIR ADAPTATION IN KAZAKHSTAN

The article examines existing models of legal regulation of private detective activity (private investigation) in foreign countries – primarily in the European Union, the United States of America, and the CIS states. The study analyzes institutional and legal approaches ranging from strict state regulation with licensing and oversight to decentralized and fragmented systems. The main advantages and disadvantages of different models are identified. Particular attention is paid to the possibility of adapting foreign experience to Kazakhstan, with recommendations for introducing licensing, establishing a supervisory authority, integrating private detectives into the legal system, and ensuring compliance with international human rights standards. The conclusion emphasizes the need for a balanced approach that would legalize and control private investigations in Kazakhstan while avoiding both excessive regulation and legal vacuum.

1. Mukhamadieva, G.N. Private Detective Work as a Guarantee of the Realization of Individual Rights and Freedoms in Criminal Proceedings / G.N. Mukhamadieva, Y.T. Alimkulov, A.A. Aryn // Bulletin of Law (Al-Farabi Kazakh National University). – 2021. – № 98 (2). – S. 84-92.

2. Sharipova, A. Legal Characteristics of Private Detective Activity in the Republic of Kazakhstan / A. Sharipova, et al. // Eurasian Journal of Law and Security. – 2024. – Vol. 3. No. 2. – Pp. 67-78.

3. Whitford, T. “A Necessary but Dangerous Class”: Early Private Investigators in Australia / T. Whitford //salus Journal. – 2015. – Vol. 3. No. 3. – Pp. 28-39.

4. P. De Hert, S. Gutwirth. Privacy, data protection and law enforcement. Opacity of the individual and transparency of power. In: Claes E., Duff A., Gutwirth S. (eds) Privacy and the criminal law. AntwerpOxford: Intersentia, 2006. – Pp. 61-104.

5. Frantsuz, A. Organisational and Legal Basis of Private Detectives in Poland and Ukraine / A. Frantsuz, Y. Tupichenko // Journal of Law and Administration. – 2022. – Vol. 18. No. 3. – Pp. 117-128.

6. Nassyrov, G. Public Interest in the Private Detective / G. Nassyrov. – Almaty: Institute of Law, 2011. – 145 p.

7. Heinze, A. Evidence Illegally Obtained by Private Investigators and Its Use Before International Criminal Tribunals / A. Heinze // New Criminal Law Review. – 2021. – Vol. 24. № 2. – Pp. 212-253.

8. Przybyłowicz, P. The Role of the Private Investigator in Criminal Proceedings / P. Przybyłowicz // Polish Yearbook of Criminology and Criminal Law. – 2024. – Vol. 9. – Pp. 25-39.

9. Geddes, R. The Private Investigator and the Right to Privacy / R. Geddes // Alberta Law Review. – 1989. – Vol. 27. – Pp. 256.

10. Zaleckis, K. Unused Possibilities of Detective Activities: comparative analysis / K. Zaleckis. – Vilnius: Lithuanian Law University Press, 2017. – 126 p.

11. Dudkin, D.A. Problemy grazhdansko-pravovyh otnoshenij mezhdu detektivami i pravoohranitel'nymi organami / D.A. Dudkin // Pravo i jekonomika. – 2023. – № 1 (419). – S. 48-53.

12. Frantsuz, A.J. Technical Support of Private Detective Activity in Ukraine / A.J. Frantsuz, I.S. Yelisieiev // Legal Bulletin. – 2022. – № 5 (94). – Pp. 74-80.

13. Zhursimbayev, S.K. About the importance of the adoption of the law in relation to private detectives /s.K. Zhursimbayev, E.S. Kemali // Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law. – 2024. – № 1 (6). – Pp. 36-43.