ABOUT THE NECESSITY TO IMPROVE THE MODEL OF CONCILIATION PROCEDURES IN KAZAKHSTAN

The article examines the problems of conciliation procedures applied in the sphere of civil law. The relevance of the topic of this article is caused by insufficient regulation of the sphere of conciliation procedures and existing gaps and contradictions in the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as the associated lack of a clear understanding of the mechanism for implementing conciliation procedures.
The authors determined that insufficiently complete and incorrect legislative regulation of conciliation procedures creates the basis for their incorrect application, and also contributes to the formation of a distorted idea of conciliation procedures in society, based on the lack of trust in these mechanisms.
The article contains an analysis of conciliation procedures taking into account the systems approach, presented in a comparative table, along with statistical data and proposals for the development of conceptual foundations for their new model, taking into account foreign experience.

1. Momotov, V.V. Primiritel'nye procedury v civilisticheskom processe: zakonodatel'nye novelly i perspektivy dal'nejshego razvitija / V.V. Momotov // Lex russica. – 2024. – № 5 (77). – S. 9-21.

2. Fells, R. Effective Negotiation. From research to results. (Third edition) / R. Fells. – Cambridge University Press, 2016. – 430 p.

3. L. Charkoudian, et. al. What Difference Does ADR Make? Comparison of ADR and Trial Outcomes in Small Claims Court [Jelektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs/1585/ (data obrashhenija: 15.02.2025).

4. C. Catherine. A Comparative Analysis of Scotland and the United States’ Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems [Jelektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/theses/63/ (data obrashhenija: 15.02.2025).

5. Bailey, R. ADR a comparative study in common law jurisdiction – How does North America compare with the rest of the world [Jelektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8024603 (data obrashhenija: 15.02.2025).

6. Lee, G. Euro-Korean Perspectives on the Use of Arbitration and ADR Mechanisms for Solving Intellectual Property Disputes / G. Lee, et. al. // Arbitration International. – 2014. – No. 1 (30). – Pp. 91-123.

7. Kuanova, I.Z. Mediacija v sude v grazhdanskom processe: uchebnyj kurs dlja sudej / I.Z. Kuanova. – Astana, 2017. – 93 s.

8. Asanova, S.Je. Al'ternativnye sposoby razreshenija sporov v grazhdanskom processe: teoreticheskij i prakticheskij aspekty: dis. ... d-ra filosofii (PhD) / S.Je. Asanova. – Almaty, 2022. – 145 s.

9. Kumarbekkyzy, Zh. Znachenie i perspektivy razvitija instituta mediacii pri razreshenii konfliktov v Respublike Kazahstan / Zh. Kumarbekkyzy, R.A. Amerhanov // Құқyқ қorғau organdary akademijasynyң Zharshysy. – 2024. – № 1 (31). – S. 52-59.