THE ROLE OF DISCIPLINARY RESPONSIBILITY IN PREVENTING AND PREVENTING CORRUPTION: ANALYSIS AND PROPOSALS
https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2024_34_63
Abstract
In the article, the author conducted a brief historical excursion into disciplinary practice during the period of validity of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On the fight against corruption” and after the adoption of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On combating corruption”.
Statistical data and theses are presented on the dynamics of growth and reduction in the detection of disciplinary offenses related to violations of anti-corruption legislation and its possible causes.
The norms of the UN Convention against Corruption on the possibility of applying disciplinary measures to persons violating the requirements of anti-corruption legislation, as well as the requirements of regulatory legal acts of foreign countries are reflected regarding disciplinary liability.
Instruments to combat corruption in foreign countries are considered, in particular, the institution of public censure of persons who have committed corruption disciplinary offenses. One of the psychological factors of corruption in maintaining a public register of persons who have committed a corruption disciplinary offense is also given.
According to the author, the introduction of the institution of corruption disciplinary liability into national legislation in the future will have a beneficial effect on reducing the level of corruption in the country.
About the Author
K. K. Tusupov
The Law Enforcement Academy under the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Tusupov Kairakbay Kenesovich – Senior Researcher of the Center for Research of Problems in the Field of Protection of Public Interests of the Interdepartmental Research Institute of the Academy of Law Enforcement Agencies under the Prosecutor General's Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Kosshy c.
References
1. Osipjan, B.A. Kriterii pravomernogo razlichenija ponjatij i sostavov grazhdanskogo pravonarushenija (delikta), disciplinarnogo prostupka, administrativnogo pravonarushenija i prestuplenija [Jelektronnyj resurs] / B.A. Osipjan // Juridicheskaja nauka i pravoohranitel'naja praktika. – 2016. – № 4 (38). – S. 14-24. – Rezhim dostupa: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kriterii-pravomernogorazlicheniya-ponyatiy-i-sostavov-grazhdanskogo-pravonarusheniya-delikta-distsiplinarnogo-prostupka (data obrashhenija: 14.10.2024).
2. Zhuravlev, A.L. Psihologicheskie faktory korrupcii / A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Jurevich // Vestnik Rossijskoj Akademii nauk. – 2015. – № 11 (85). – S. 1019-1027.
Review
For citations:
Tusupov K.K. THE ROLE OF DISCIPLINARY RESPONSIBILITY IN PREVENTING AND PREVENTING CORRUPTION: ANALYSIS AND PROPOSALS. Bulletin of the Law Enforcement Academy. 2024;(4 (34)):63-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52425/25187252_2024_34_63
Views:
93
JATS XML
Email this article 