Preview

Bulletin of the Law Enforcement Academy

Advanced search

DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY AS A LEGAL CATEGORY: BETWEEN NATIONAL JURISDICTION AND THE POWER OF DIGITAL PLATFORMS

Abstract

Amid the transformation of the global digital order and the growing influence of transnational platforms, traditional understandings of state sovereignty are undergoing significant reconsideration. This article examines digital sovereignty as an emerging legal category situated at the intersection of state jurisdiction and private platform power. The authors propose a differentiated framework in which digital sovereignty is analyzed through three domains of legal regulation: territorial, network, and algorithmic. The article explores legal models developed in the European Union, the United States, and selected countries of the Global South, including India, Brazil, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia, which illustrate diverse approaches to building normative autonomy and exercising control over digital flows. The paper argues for the need to reconceptualize sovereignty as a flexible and functional legal construct aimed at ensuring regulatory accountability of digital actors, algorithmic transparency, and the advancement of co-regulation mechanisms. Finally, it outlines directions for the regulatory structuring of digital sovereignty in the context of a fragmented normative landscape and increasing tensions between governmental authority and corporate influence.

About the Authors

K. K. Seitenov
The Law Enforcement Academy under the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan

Seitenov Kaliolla Kabayevich – First Vice-Rector of the Law Enforcement Academy under
the Prosecutor General's Office

Kosshy



M. B. Sadykov
The Law Enforcement Academy under the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan

Sadykov Mukhtar Beybutovich – Senior Lecturer at the Department of Special Legal Disciplines of the Institute of Postgraduate Education, PhD, Master of Public Administration

Kosshy



References

1. Mueller, M.L. Against Sovereignty in Cyberspace / M.L. Mueller // International Studies Review. – 2020. – Vol. 22, no. 4. – Pp. 779-801.

2. De Gregorio, G. The Rise of Digital Constitutionalism in the European Union / G. De Gregorio // International Journal of Constitutional Law. – 2021. – Vol. 19, no. 1. – Pp. 41-70.

3. Robles‑Carrillo, M. Sovereignty vs Digital Sovereignty: A Critical Overview / M. Robles‑Carrillo // Journal of Digital Technologies and Law. – 2023. – Vol. 1, no. 3. – Pp. 673-689.

4. Belli, L. BRICS countries to build digital sovereignty / L. Belli // CyberBRICS: Cybersecurity regulations in the BRICS countries. – Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. – Pp. 271-280.

5. Jansen, B. Pushing boundaries: An empirical view on the digital sovereignty of six governments in the midst of geopolitical tensions / B. Jansen, et al. // Government Information Quarterly. – 2023. – T. 40. № 4. – Pp. 101862.

6. Wu, E. Sovereignty and data localization / E. Wu. – Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs; Harvard Kennedy School: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021. – 34 p.

7. Pohle, J. Digital sovereignty / J. Pohle, T. Thiel // Internet Policy Review. Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society, Berlin. – 2020. – Vol. 9. № 4. – Pp. 1-19.

8. Fratini, S. Digital sovereignty: A descriptive analysis and a critical evaluation of existing models / S. Fratini, et al. // Digital Society. – 2024. – T. 3. № 3. – Pp. 1-27.

9. Wischmeyer, T. Artificial intelligence and transparency: opening the black box // Regulating artificial intelligence / T. Wischmeyer // Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. – Pp. 75-101.

10. Zalnieriute, M. The rule of law and automation of government decision-making / M. Zalnieriute, L.B. Moses, G. Williams // The Modern Law Review. – 2019. – T. 82. № 3. – Pp. 425-455.

11. Yeung, K. Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation / K. Yeung // Regulation & governance. – 2018. – T. 12. № 4. – Pp. 505-523.

12. Edler, J. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means / J. Edler, et al. // Research Policy. – 2023. – T. 52. № 6. – Pp. 104765.

13. Srivastava, S. Ai, global governance, and digital sovereignty / S. Srivastava, J. Bullock // arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17481. – 2024. – Pp. 1-20.

14. Baldoni, R. Sovereignty in the digital era: The quest for continuous access to dependable technological capabilities / R. Baldoni, G. Di Luna // IEEE Security & Privacy. – 2025. – T. 23. № 1. – Pp. 91-96.

15. Kosseff, J. The twenty-six words that created the Internet / J. Kosseff. – Cornell University Press, 2019. – 328 p.

16. Mitchell, A.D. Cloud services and government digital sovereignty in Australia and beyond / A.D. Mitchell, T. Samlidis // International Journal of Law and Information Technology. – 2021. – T. 29. № 4. – Pp. 364-394.

17. Celeste, E. Digital sovereignty in the EU: challenges and future perspectives / E. Celeste // Data protection beyond borders: Transatlantic perspectives on extraterritoriality and sovereignty. – 2021. – Pp. 211-228.

18. George, A.S. Indian Own Browser: A Step Towards Digital Sovereignty / A.S. George, T. Baskar // Partners Universal International Innovation Journal. – 2025. – T. 3. № 2. – Pp. 1-17.


Review

For citations:


Seitenov K.K., Sadykov M.B. DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY AS A LEGAL CATEGORY: BETWEEN NATIONAL JURISDICTION AND THE POWER OF DIGITAL PLATFORMS. Bulletin of the Law Enforcement Academy. 2025;(3 (37)):25-34.

Views: 136

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2518-7252 (Print)
ISSN 3079-4609 (Online)