UTOMATION OF ALIMONY COLLECTION PROCESSES: PROSPECTS FOR THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

The article discusses the prospects for the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies in the processes of alimony recovery in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The study is based on an analysis of international regulations, scientific publications, as well as the works of foreign authors reflecting the concepts of digitalization of justice and automation of law enforcement procedures.

The author substantiates the need to form a comprehensive digital system of enforcement proceedings that integrates interdepartmental databases and intelligent forecasting algorithms. The potential advantages and risks of using artificial intelligence, as well as possible threats to the principles of legality and justice, are shown. In conclusion, proposals are formulated to improve regulatory regulation, ethical standards, and organizational and technical mechanisms for the introduction of artificial intelligence into the enforcement of court decisions.

1. Wirtz, B.W. Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector - Applications and Challenges / B.W. Wirtz, J.C. Weyerer, C. Geyer // International Journal of Information Management. – 2019. – № 43. – Pp. 1-14.

2. Kuhlmann, S. Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration: Potentials, Challenges, and Risks / S. Kuhlmann, M. Heuberger // Public Management Review. – 2021. – № 23 (7). – Pp. 1020-1036.

3. Aletras, N. Predicting Judicial Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Natural Language Processing Perspective / N. Aletras, et al. // PeerJ Computer Science. – 2016. – № 2 (93). – Pp. 1-19.

4. Katz, D.M. A General Approach for Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States / D.M. Katz, M.J. Bommarito, J. Blackman // PLOS ONE. – 2017. – № 12 (4). – Pp. 1-18.

5. Medvedeva, M. Using Machine Learning to Predict Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights / M. Medvedeva, M. Vols, M. Wieling // Artificial Intelligence and Law. – 2020. – № 28. – Pp. 237-266.

6. Rawls, J.A Theory of Justice / J. Rawls. – Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971. – 538 s.

7. Janssen, M. The Challenges and Limits of Big Data Algorithms in Public Sector Decision Making / M. Janssen, G. Kuk // Government Information Quarterly. – 2016. – № 33 (3). – Pp. 371-377.

8. Sourdin, T. Law, Artificial Intelligence and Digital Platforms. / T. Sourdin, R. Cornes // Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. – 2021. – 320 s.

9. Wachter, S. Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation / S. Wachter, B. Mittelstadt, L. Floridi // International Data Privasy Law. – 2017. – № 7 (2). – Pp. 76-99.

10. Sadykov, M.B. The use of artificial intelligence in law enforcement activity / M.B. Sadykov, S.Ch. Gajanayaka // Құқyқ қorғau organdary akademijasynyң Zharshysy. – 2024. – № 1 (31). – Pp. 175-183.

11. Nurkeeva, D.R. The usage of artificial intelligence to ensure the principle of legality in criminal proceedings: opportunities and risks / D.R. Nurkeeva, M.B. Sadykov // Құқyқ қorғau organdary akademijasynyң Zharshysy. – 2024. – № 3 (33). – Pp. 101-108.