ANALYSIS OF THE STATE OF LEGALITY: NATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND POSSIBILITIES OF APPLICATION IN FOREIGN PRACTICE

This article is devoted to the study of the main issues of the application of the analysis of the state of legality as a form of prosecutorial supervision in the Republic of Kazakhstan. This form of analysis has proven to be effective and has a positive impact on the state of legality in the country.

The article also examines the experience of using forms of prosecutorial activity in some foreign countries, but focuses of the fact that Kazakhstan has introduced an inherently unique data analysis system in the work of the Prosecutor’s Office, which has no direct analogues in other countries.

The authors reveal the issue of work in this direction in the Republic of Kyrgyzstan, which has adopted the Kazakh experience, giving the Prosecutor’s Office the authority to carry out information and analytical activities using the information exchange system of law enforcement and other government agencies. In the Russian Federation, it was noted that insufficient attention is paid to preventive activities, and it was proposed to improve the analytical work of prosecutors by developing and implementing a unified information and analytical system. Nevertheless, analysis, as one form of supreme supervision, is a unique aspect of the prosecutorial activity of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

1. Kravchenko, A.N. Pravovye instrumenty realizacii pravozashhitnoj roli prokurora v social'nojekonomicheskoj sfere: materialy mezhdunar. nauchn.-prakt. konf. – Almata: Zhetі zharғy, 2004. – 172 s.

2. Zhursimbaev, S.K. Jepohal'noe sobytie v zhizni nadzornogo organa / S.K. Zhursimbaev // Құқyқ қorғau organdary akademijasynyң Zharshysy. – 2021. – № 22. – S. 94-96.

3. Ergeshov, B.Sh. Teoretiko-pravovye osnovy prokurorskogo nadzora v forme analiza sostojanija zakonnosti: teorija i praktika // Razvitie sovremennoj juridicheskoj nauki: materialy VII mezhdunar. nauchn.-prakt. konf. – Kosshy: Akademija pravoohranitel'nyh organov pri General'noj prokurature Respubliki Kazahstan, 2024. – 602 s.

4. Prokuratura v zarubezhnyh gosudarstvah: uchebnoe posobie; pod obshh. red. Merzadinova E.S. – Almaty, TOO «Lantar Trejd», 2019. – 210 s.

5. David, A.S. The nature and function of prosecutorial power / A.S. David // J. Crim. L. & Criminology. – 2016. – № 106. – Pp. 473-520.

6. Mathalikov, R.O. Supervision over the use of expert knowledge in conducting investigative actions / R.O. Mathalikov // The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology. – 2024. – № 6 (9). – Pp. 147-150.

7. Bibas, S. The need for prosecutorial discretion / S. Bibas // Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. – 2009. – № 19. – Pp. 369-375.

8. Tjurenkova, K.A. Konstitucionno-pravovoj status prokuratury v zarubezhnyh stranah: sravnitel'no-pravovoj analiz / K.A. Tjurenkova, A.S. Demidov // Molodoj uchenyj. – 2015. – № 21.– S. 633-636.

9. Shherba, S.P. Prokuratura v stranah SNG: pravovoj status, funkcii, polnomochija / S.P. Shherba, T.A. Reshetnikova, O.A. Zajcev. – M.: Jekzamen, 2007. – 557 s.

10. Raskina, T.V. Teoreticheskie aspekty analiticheskoj dejatel'nosti prokurorov po profilaktike prestupnosti i pravonarushaemosti / T.V. Raskina // Kriminologicheskij zhurnal Bajkal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta jekonomiki i prava. – 2016. – № 1 (10). – S. 170-178.